The Libertarian Snakebite Kit - Day

2:14PM - up yours, "libertarian leaning" Reptile

I posted an article, Bush Voters as Belly Crawling Cowards, and one of the commenters (thudpucker) chose to categorize it as "this wonderfully single sided and slightly spittle flecked article". Here's one of my replies:

And, amazingly, Adams managed to get his point across with the use of the words "cocksucker", "dickweed", "cretin" or (always a winner) "fascist".

That's odd. Mr. Adams was the founder of the Sons of Liberty, a rabble rousing bunch of radicals that provoked the Boston Massacre. Under the Bushies definition, the Sons of Liberty would be classified "terrorists". Yes, the founding fathers lead and encouraged "terrorism". As did the founders of Israel, and quite a few other countries. And I don't think they were polite about it either. So fuck off.

As an aside for all you French haters out there, there would be no Declaration of Independence, no Constitution if not for the French. The French government and private citizens actively supported and/or condoned the rebellion.

In your original post, you presented information stating that anyone who voted for Bush was wrong. You did not present info against both parties, only the Republicans; both your post and the article came across as being presented as Liberals.

Well, how odd. I looked through your journal and found you criticisms of Kerry and none of Bush. In fact, on October 13, 2004 at 4:25 pm this is your post:

Title: "There were no WMD's, so there was no reason at all to intervene in Iraq's internal affairs."

"He said excavators found the body of a mother still clutching her baby. The infant was shot in the back of the head and the mother in the face." [ed note: report from the ever "fair and balanced" Fox Propaganda]

Christ.


You sound like ones of those "force is OK when I say it is" kind of "libertarians". I'm not saying that what was done was anything but evil, but rabid Bush supporters (and you) like Fox Propaganda are still trying to justify raiding a country under false pretenses. Since you seem to be so concerned about this story, what about all the Iraqi civilians killed by "coalition" forces? I'd guess that you don't care about "collateral damage".

I'm not even going to get too far into the details for the biggest issue: that this country built up Sadaam Hussein's power base by feeding it quite a bit of aid.

And what about the repressive right-wing governments that the US government supports? They love slaughtering their opponents. Reptiles, I don't think, have ever found a repressive right-wing government that they don't like. As James Bovard has said, governments in the 20th century have killed something in the range of 100 million people. What's your opinion about that?

--------------------------------------------------------------------

And then there's this post on November 15th, 2004 at 02:29 pm entitled "Reality Check from The Observer" which in part says:
Until a viable third party comes along, the best thing for the American people is having the two main parties actually present a position that is viable to the majority.


Well, we're not going to have a viable party system until the Demogogues and the Reptiles cease to actively suppress parties other than own. And the "media" is just another coconspirator in this scam. The Libertarian Party and all other "third parties" are in a constant battle to stay alive because of state actions () to decertify those parties.

That's in concert with Demogogue and the Reptile operatives telling people that ask about our candidates that they're "wasting" their vote if they vote for, say Badnarik. And then they throw in the FUD (fear, uncertainty, doubt) factor. What a crock of shit. If you extend that to its "logical" conclusion, everyone that doesn't vote for the winner "wastes" their vote. And if that's the case, we might as well have a one party system (like quite a few Reptile commentators would like to have).

Now shoo. The grownups would like to talk.

Fuck off, retard. I've been a classical liberal for over 35 years, and I'm sick of dealing with "libertarian leaning" Reptiles like you. I'd only agree with the analysis that the piece "came across as being presented as Liberals" if you used the term "liberal" in the European sense, which is the same as the term in America "classical liberal". If you don't believe in personal freedom and you don't detest the Patriot Act and other such "laws", then you have NO standing to clam that you're a libertarian. As you said, "People can claim anything".